Nikoleta Đukanović, a political scientist, recently criticized the actions of Milan Knežević and the police regarding an environmental project in Botun, Montenegro. She described these actions as a form of sabotage against the country’s European integration efforts. According to Đukanović, the focus on this issue is more about political theatrics than genuine concern for the health and opinions of the residents of Botun.
She stated during her appearance on the central news program “24 Hours” on Television E that the situation in Botun is not surprising. Instead of addressing environmental issues, it has transformed into what she terms a “political spectacle.” Đukanović pointed out that Knežević and Andrija Mandić treat the situation as a task meant to appease their political partners in Belgrade, rather than addressing the actual needs of the citizens.
The police’s recent conduct drew attention, with many officials praising their actions without recalling how they had previously responded to peaceful protests. Đukanović highlighted the contrast in police behavior during various events, including protests related to the July 13 award ceremony and demonstrations by students following a tragedy in Cetinje. She expressed concern that the police forces are being politicized and instrumentalized to serve the interests of specific political parties, particularly pro-Serbian parties, leading to a form of privatization of the police.
Đukanović emphasized the urgent need for a wastewater treatment project, arguing that it is crucial for both environmental protection and the health of the population. She stated, “If our politicians and political parties are the Europeans they claim to be, they should support this project rather than sabotage it.” Her assertion is that the political maneuvering is not about the project or the residents of Botun, but rather about external political pressures.
Commenting on Knežević’s announcement that he would leave the government due to police actions, Đukanović expressed skepticism. She noted inconsistencies in his statements, suggesting that his actions may not lead to a significant political shift. “This is purely a political game meant to satisfy the needs of their partners in Belgrade,” she said, lamenting the manipulation of citizens in this political theatre.
She further reflected on the reaction of the president of the Zeta municipality, Mihailo Asanović, calling it a personal stance rather than a party position. According to Đukanović, political reactions and statements from figures such as Jakov Milatović and Andrija Mandić indicate a broader political strategy leading up to the 2027 elections.
Milatović’s recent comments were seen by Đukanović as an attempt to deflect responsibilities while simultaneously undermining the credibility of his government. She remarked that the political environment appears to be preparing for future elections rather than addressing pressing issues.
Additionally, she raised concerns about the involvement of Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić in supporting Knežević, stating that such actions constitute interference in Montenegro’s internal affairs. The vice president of the government, Filip Ivanović, also drew attention for his justification of police actions, suggesting a deeper connection to the political dynamics at play.
In summary, Đukanović’s analysis underscores a complex intersection of politics and environmental issues in Montenegro. The ongoing situation in Botun reflects broader struggles related to European integration and local governance, with the potential for significant implications as the country approaches future elections.
