UPDATE: The Constitutional Court of Montenegro has failed to reach a decision on the detention appeals of Danilo Mandić during a session held earlier today. The court experienced a tie in votes, preventing the necessary majority from being achieved to rule on the three appeals submitted for review.
This urgent situation arises as three judges argued that the court is authorized to assess the level of reasonable suspicion surrounding Mandić’s detention, questioning the arbitrary nature of its justification. In contrast, two judges maintained their consistent stance, asserting that the court should defer to regular judicial authorities regarding the sufficiency of evidence supporting reasonable suspicion. They emphasized that it is not the role of the Constitutional Court to scrutinize the adequacy of legal reasoning unless it lacks any argumentation.
The court’s deliberations pertained to detention extensions issued in July, August, and September 2023. With no majority reached, the court will await the appointment of missing judges before reconvening for a new vote.
This development is critically important as it underscores ongoing tensions within Montenegro’s judicial system regarding the handling of high-profile cases. The implications of this ruling could significantly affect Mandić’s legal standing and the broader judicial landscape in the country.
As the situation continues to unfold, observers are keenly watching for the appointment of judges and the next steps in this high-stakes legal battle. Stay tuned for updates as this story develops.
