Pathologist Claims Husband’s Death ‘Much More Likely’ an Accident

UPDATE: A defense pathologist in the trial of Daryl Berman, accused of murdering her husband, David Berman, has just testified that the incident is “much more in favor” of being an accident. This dramatic claim was made during the ongoing proceedings at Minshull Street Crown Court on December 11, 2023.

The prosecution alleges that Mrs. Berman, 71, fatally stabbed her 84-year-old husband at their home on Butterstile Lane, Prestwich, on March 13. Daryl Berman has denied the charge, maintaining that her husband’s death was a tragic accident, claiming he fell onto a knife she was using in the kitchen.

In a significant moment on day three of the trial, pathologist Dr. Richard Shepherd, who was called by the defense, highlighted the peculiar circumstances surrounding Mr. Berman’s death. He described the placement of the stab wound as “very odd,” stating it could have been caused by a “horizontal jabbing motion,” yet emphasized that it required “severe force.” Dr. Shepherd noted, “Accidental injuries are very rare,” reinforcing the complexity of the case.

The court was previously informed that the couple had a “loving and mutually supportive” marriage, with no history of domestic violence. This backdrop adds an emotional layer to the trial, as jurors weigh the evidence surrounding a long-term relationship now marred by tragedy.

Dr. Shepherd’s testimony came after Dr. Philip Lumb conducted a post-mortem examination, declaring it “inconceivable” that the fatal wound was accidental, especially given the details of a potential defensive injury on Mr. Berman’s finger. The defense, however, has consistently pushed back against this interpretation, with Dr. Shepherd arguing the finger injury’s location makes it unlikely to be defensive.

As the trial unfolds, the tension escalates. Mrs. Berman’s defense hinges on the possibility that her husband’s death was a tragic accident, while prosecutors argue there is compelling evidence of intent. Dr. Shepherd’s insistence on the accidental nature of the incident is pivotal, as it could sway jurors in a case filled with emotional weight and intense scrutiny.

The trial continues to capture public attention, raising questions about domestic relationships and the complexities that can lead to such heartbreaking outcomes. As the jury deliberates, the stakes are high, and the community remains on edge, waiting for a verdict that will undoubtedly resonate beyond the courtroom.

What to watch for next: The trial is expected to resume soon, with further testimonies that may shed light on the circumstances surrounding this tragic incident. The outcome remains unclear, but the implications for the Berman family and the broader community are profound.