Mike Bird’s “The Land Trap” Explores the Politics of Land Ownership

The issue of land ownership and its implications on society is at the forefront of political discourse, as highlighted in journalist Mike Bird’s latest book, The Land Trap: A New History of the World’s Oldest Asset. Bird examines the intricate relationship between land, economics, and social status, drawing connections to historical and contemporary political landscapes.

In his analysis, Bird references a significant moment from 1909 when British politician David Lloyd George criticized landlords for profiting from the work of others, a sentiment that resonates today. Recent data reveals that around one-quarter of Conservative MPs in the UK earn more than £10,000 annually from rental income. In contrast, approximately 11% of Labour MPs share similar financial interests in property rental.

The political climate has evolved, with figures such as Zohran Mamdani, the newly elected mayor of New York City, prioritizing rent control as a central campaign theme. Meanwhile, opposition to property taxes is gaining traction among conservative factions. Bird’s exploration of land ownership arrives at a pivotal moment as it re-emerges as a pressing issue in politics and society.

Land Ownership: A Historical Perspective

Historically, land ownership has been intertwined with wealth and social status, significantly shaping societal structures. However, the dynamics shifted dramatically during the Industrial Revolution with the rise of urbanization. The most valuable companies today tend to focus on technology and resources rather than traditional land holdings. Many wealthy individuals have found ways to mitigate tax burdens by relocating to regions with favorable tax conditions, further complicating the landscape of land ownership.

Bird revisits the ideas of Henry George, an influential 19th-century journalist and economist who advocated for a single tax on land. He argued that monopolies on land ownership created economic inefficiencies and drove inequality, with benefits accruing to landlords and speculators rather than productive enterprises. Despite this, the political narratives of the left and right have diverged since George’s time, focusing on class and identity issues, respectively.

The legacy of George’s ideas is perhaps best exemplified by the board game that popularized them, The Landlord’s Game, which many recognize as the precursor to Monopoly.

Bird effectively charts the resurgence of land as a crucial economic and political force in contemporary society. Real estate has become a pivotal asset, often used as collateral for loans that facilitate business growth. Notably, companies like McDonald’s derive significant revenue from property ownership, earning more through rent than from food sales.

The Contemporary Land Trap

In China, the real estate sector has been a cornerstone of the nation’s economic expansion. Local governments have relied heavily on land sales for revenue while citizens invest their life savings in property. However, Bird warns that the country may now face a critical juncture: allowing real estate prices to crash could erase middle-class wealth, while maintaining high prices risks stifling economic dynamism. This dilemma represents the “land trap” that Bird refers to in his book.

While Bird’s narrative is compelling, it does have notable gaps. For instance, the impact of technological advancements on land use is scarcely discussed. The famous adage, “Buy land, they’re not making it anymore,” overlooks the transformative role of engineering innovations, such as steel frames and elevators, that have reshaped urban landscapes. Additionally, the increasing threat of climate change, including floods and wildfires, poses significant risks to land value, a consideration that is becoming increasingly relevant.

Bird’s work serves as an insightful introduction to the economics of land ownership but offers limited exploration of its social consequences. The current landscape shows that private landlords often lack incentives to improve their properties, while public funds for housing maintenance have dwindled. This combination has contributed to a deteriorating rental sector in the UK, exacerbated by the introduction of buy-to-let mortgages nearly three decades ago.

As Bird’s book illustrates, the systems established to manage land ownership have failed to provide adequate housing solutions, leading to a resurgence of slum-like conditions in urban areas. The Land Trap is published by Hodder and is available for £25. For those interested in understanding the complexities of land ownership and its far-reaching implications, Bird’s work is an essential read.