Legal Action Against Podgorica Man for Threatening Politician

The Basic State Prosecutor’s Office in Podgorica has initiated legal proceedings against an individual identified as Đ.Č. from Podgorica. This action follows allegations that on January 26, 2026, at approximately 18:30, Đ.Č. posted derogatory comments on the social media platform Facebook, targeting Ivan Vuković, a member of the parliament. The statements purportedly violated public order and peace, as confirmed by the Podgorica prosecutor’s office.

The situation escalated after Ivan Vuković, a member of the Democratic Party of Socialists (DPS), called for police intervention. He had received multiple threats on social media platforms, prompting his request for action. In response to the hostility he faced, Vuković commented on the social network X, indicating that derogatory terms such as “nothing goods” and “thief” are insults that someone in politics must endure. He also expressed uncertainty about the phrase “fit for the trunk,” further highlighting the severity of the threats he perceived.

Context of the Incident

The incident stems from public discourse surrounding political activities in Montenegro. Vuković had recently acknowledged the closure of a chapter in negotiations with the European Union, a significant milestone for the country. His statement on social media was met with backlash and threats, underscoring the contentious climate in Montenegrin politics.

The prosecutor’s office has taken these threats seriously, emphasizing the importance of maintaining public order and the safety of individuals in political roles. The case against Đ.Č. is set to be evaluated by the Court for Minor Offenses in Podgorica, where further legal proceedings will determine the consequences of his actions.

As of now, the legal framework surrounding such threats is under scrutiny, with many advocating for stronger protections for public figures from online harassment. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how similar incidents are handled in the future, illuminating the balance between free speech and the necessity of safeguarding public officials.

Authorities continue to monitor the situation closely, with both the police and the prosecutor’s office committed to addressing threats against individuals in public service. This incident serves as a reminder of the challenges faced by politicians in maintaining their safety while engaging with the public in a digital age.