The Human Rights Ombudsman of Montenegro has recommended that Darijo Vraneš, the mayor of Pljevlja, remove a controversial Instagram post that he made in December 2022. The post was a response to critical comments made by Milka Tadić Mijović, the executive director of the Center for Investigative Journalism, regarding Vraneš’s nationalistic remarks.
In his post, Vraneš quoted a line from a literary work, questioning whether Tadić Mijović was a “witch,” and included several smiley emojis. This comment has been criticized for its offensive nature and perceived encouragement of misogyny. The Ombudsman emphasized the need for Vraneš to refrain from making public statements that promote discrimination against women and perpetuate harmful stereotypes.
The Ombudsman’s report, which was reviewed by local media, indicates that Vraneš is required to submit a report within 30 days detailing the actions taken in response to the Ombudsman’s recommendations. The document highlights the importance of ensuring that public figures do not engage in discourse that may incite discrimination or degrade women based on gender or age.
In early December, Vraneš defended the legitimacy of the Assembly of Podgorica, which facilitated Montenegro’s annexation to Serbia in 1918, a claim that has been disputed by “Montenegrin separatists.” Tadić Mijović criticized Vraneš’s remarks, stating that they were expected and indicative of his views, which she described as contrary to a modern, democratic Montenegro. She remarked that Vraneš appears to celebrate historical figures associated with oppression and nationalism, further asserting that “our children will go to Europe, not follow Vraneš.”
In light of the situation, the Basic Prosecutor’s Office in Pljevlja has filed a request for the initiation of a misdemeanor procedure against Vraneš for his comments directed at Tadić Mijović. The Ombudsman’s opinion, signed by Deputy Ombudsman Nerma Dobardžić, argues that Vraneš’s comments, while potentially part of political discourse, cross the line into expressions that reinforce gender and age-based stereotypes.
The report underscores that the use of derogatory language aimed at older women, particularly in the context of public debate, contradicts the principles of equality. It asserts that Vraneš’s remarks should not be seen as mere political commentary but rather as an expression that perpetuates societal biases.
The Ombudsman notes that the impact of Vraneš’s statements is magnified by the fact that they were made through his official municipal account, which carries significant weight in public perception. This dynamic could discourage not only Tadić Mijović but also other women and older individuals from participating in public life.
The document further clarifies that Vraneš’s claims of not intending to offend anyone and his assertion of respect for all women, regardless of personal characteristics, are irrelevant in assessing discrimination. The Ombudsman emphasizes that the objective effect and the public message are what matter, rather than the author’s subjective intentions.
In conclusion, the Ombudsman reiterates that freedom of expression does not entail the right to use language that is unnecessary for political debate and may harm the dignity of individuals or create a hostile environment based on gender or age. The outcome of this situation will likely shape future discourse in Pljevlja and potentially influence broader discussions about gender equality in Montenegro.
