UPDATE: Acclaimed author Thomas King, known for his poignant narratives on Indigenous experiences, has just revealed a shocking truth: he has no Native American heritage. This revelation, disclosed on November 26, 2025, follows a thorough investigation by the Tribal Alliance Against Frauds, leaving King and his readers stunned.
In a heartfelt admission published in The Globe and Mail, the 82-year-old writer expressed his turmoil after learning from a genealogist that his long-held belief of being part-Cherokee was unfounded. For nearly four decades, King has identified as a member of the Cherokee Nation, drawing on this identity to craft over 20 influential books that explore the struggles and injustices faced by Indigenous peoples in North America.
King, who was raised with the belief that his father was of Cherokee descent, stated, “It’s been a couple of weeks since that video call, and I’m still reeling,” describing his feelings of being “ripped in half.” The revelation came during a video call with the genealogist, who meticulously traced his family lineage and found no connection to Cherokee heritage whatsoever.
The shock has raised urgent questions about identity and authenticity in literary representation, particularly as King grapples with whether he inadvertently took opportunities away from genuine Indigenous authors. Despite the recommendation from the Tribal Alliance to apologize for the misunderstanding, King refrained, insisting he acted in good faith, believing in his Indigenous roots.
This unfolding saga occurs alongside heightened scrutiny of public figures regarding their claims to Indigenous ancestry. Recent controversies include accusations against singer Buffy Saint-Marie and the fallout for Boston’s Mayor Michelle Wu, who faced backlash for hosting a racially exclusive event.
King’s admission illuminates the broader implications of identity, culture, and the responsibilities that come with representation in literature. As he navigates this complex emotional landscape, King acknowledges the potential fallout with Indigenous organizations and artists who may distance themselves from him.
Moving forward, readers and literary circles are poised to reflect deeply on the nuances of cultural identity and the authenticity behind narratives that shape public perception. The literary community is now left to ponder the impact of King’s works and the critical conversations that will undoubtedly arise from this startling revelation.
As this developing story unfolds, it serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of honesty in cultural representation, and the ongoing dialogue about heritage and identity in the arts. Stay tuned for more updates on this significant news story as reactions continue to pour in.
