URGENT UPDATE: Brittany Higgins is poised to be declared bankrupt today as former Liberal Senator Linda Reynolds escalates her claim for $1 million in damages. This dramatic development comes shortly after Higgins dropped her appeal against Reynolds’ defamation victory.
In a significant move, Reynolds has filed a creditors petition in the Australian Federal Court against Higgins, amplifying the stakes in this high-profile legal battle. Reports indicate that Reynolds’ legal team will also seek a sequestration order, which would empower a trustee in bankruptcy to take control of Higgins’ financial affairs.
It remains uncertain whether Higgins will oppose this order, but sources suggest she is not expected to appear in the Perth court today. If the court grants the order, a trustee will assume oversight of Higgins’ finances with Reynolds recognized as a creditor.
This case stems from a ruling by the Western Australian Supreme Court, which found that Higgins had defamed Reynolds through various social media posts. The court has also held Higgins’ husband, David Sharaz, jointly liable for damages due to his involvement in disseminating a defamatory tweet and Instagram story. Sharaz will also face bankruptcy proceedings and is scheduled for a hearing in December.
The implications of this case extend beyond legal ramifications, as it highlights the intense scrutiny and public interest in the ongoing fallout from the allegations made by Higgins. The emotional toll on both parties is significant, with public sentiments divided on the issues at hand.
As this story develops, many are closely watching the proceedings in Perth. The court’s decision today could mark a pivotal moment in both Higgins’ and Reynolds’ lives, shaping their futures in profound ways.
Stay tuned for updates as this situation unfolds. Daily Mail has reached out to Higgins for further comments, while Sharaz has declined to provide any statements at this time.
This urgent legal matter is drawing significant public attention, and the outcome could set important precedents in defamation law and personal accountability in the digital age.
