A couple in the United States, expecting their second child, has shared a list of baby names they will not use due to the implications of their surname, Cox. Quincie and Zach Cox are preparing to welcome a baby girl and have taken to social media to discuss their unique naming dilemma. Their approach highlights the importance of considering how a first name pairs with a surname, particularly when that surname might lead to unfortunate or crude innuendos.
Choosing a baby name typically involves various factors, from family significance to personal preferences. For many parents, the surname does not heavily influence their decisions. However, for some, it can significantly affect the options available, particularly when it comes to avoiding potential teasing or ridicule. This is precisely the situation the Cox couple finds themselves in.
In a recent Instagram video, Quincie and Zach shared names they are considering for their new arrival, alongside a candid discussion about the names they have ruled out. Among the first names they have decided against are Eden, Holden, and Harry, as these could be humorously misinterpreted when paired with their surname. For instance, “Eden Cox” could be turned into “eating Cox,” while “Holden Cox” could imply “holding Cox,” and “Harry Cox” could be interpreted as “hairy Cox.”
The couple also eliminated names such as Anita, Ryder, and Isla, which could result in phrases like “ride your Cox” or “I love Cox.” Other names, including Sharon and Sawyer, fell victim to similar wordplay, prompting Quincie and Zach to consider the long-term implications of their choices.
Public Reaction and Further Considerations
The couple’s candid sharing of their experience has resonated with many social media users. Commenters expressed both amusement and understanding over the challenges of naming a child in light of an “unfortunate” surname. One user, Harry Wang, remarked, “I wish my parents had thought like that,” reflecting on his own naming experience.
Additionally, some commenters shared their own stories, empathizing with the couple’s situation. One parent noted the challenges faced after marrying into the surname Head, stating, “I had to be careful naming my girls too!” This illustrates that concerns about names extend beyond the Cox family, with many individuals considering the long-term effects on children.
Quincie also mentioned that the situation would have been more complicated had she retained her maiden name, Pullen. This adds another layer of complexity that many parents might not consider when naming their children.
While the couple initially listed eight names, they later expanded their rejection list to include additional names like Olive, Sandy, Iva, and Robin. This highlights the broader implications of surname-related naming challenges that can affect families.
The conversation around baby names is often light-hearted, but it can carry significant weight for parents navigating these decisions. The Cox family’s experience serves as a reminder that the intersection of first names and surnames can lead to unforeseen consequences, and careful consideration is essential for parents.
